Отправлено: 17.03.05 20:34. Заголовок: ИНТЕРВЬЮ

Для желающих поделиться различными , найденными в нете интервью с нашими ( почти родными актерами ( актрисами))

 Отправлено: 24.06.05 21:03. Заголовок: Re:

Soniya пишет:

цитата

---

Мариса здесь больше не живет

---

А если она под другим ником придет?

 Отправлено: 24.06.05 21:03. Заголовок: Re:

Изюююмочка!!! пишет:

цитата

---

А если она под другим ником придет?

---

только если с другого компьютера

 Отправлено: 24.06.05 21:07. Заголовок: Re:

Soniya пишет:

цитата

---

только если с другого компьютера

---

Soniya я с тобой дружу

 Отправлено: 24.06.05 21:13. Заголовок: Re:

Изюююмочка!!!



пральна!

я и взятки беру, не отказываюсь!

 Отправлено: 24.06.05 21:20. Заголовок: Re:

Soniya пишет:

цитата

---

я и взятки беру, не отказываюсь!

---

А чем взяткм берёшь? надо же знать, чем подмазывать

 Отправлено: 24.06.05 21:23. Заголовок: Re:

Natalya пишет:

цитата

---

А чем взяткм берёшь?

---

комплиментами

 Отправлено: 24.06.05 21:27. Заголовок: Re:

Soniya

взяточница ты наша (ласково так)... любиииимая (вообще медовым голосом)

 Отправлено: 24.06.05 21:30. Заголовок: Re:

Да да!! Самая справедливая!!! И все понимающая!!! ( имеются в виду фантазии)

 Отправлено: 24.06.05 21:32. Заголовок: Re:

 Отправлено: 24.06.05 21:33. Заголовок: Re:

Lo

Изюююмочка!!!

Natalya

ой, уморили, охмурили!!


как помру, все на вас отпишу, ага

 Отправлено: 25.06.05 01:52. Заголовок: Re:

Soniya пишет:

цитата

---

Мариса здесь больше не живет.

---

Soniya, да ты вАлшебница один легкий удар по клавиатурке и ..... усё нетути

 Отправлено: 26.06.05 17:11. Заголовок: Re:

If you're in love, you'll like Paheli: Shah Rukh Khan
Shah Rukh Khan talks about his new Paheli and the reasons why he is proud of it.

Q: I don't think you've ever done a film like Paheli before.
A: Yes, and I hope I can do things like Paheli in the future as well. Paheli is very different. I could only make it when my production house could afford to take a risk. After Phir Bhi Dil Hai Hindustani and Asoka, I had to make films that were commercially viable. After Asoka, my company was in the red.

Q: Did the failure of Asoka disappoint you?
A: People said it was ahead of its time. Somehow, somewhere, we weren't able to hold the audience's attention. We were to blame. I don't think the audience ever goes to a film with the intention of rejecting it.

Either the audience is entertained, or not. If you don't like a particular food, you won't eat it. As simple as that. We make films for the audience. And we better make it entertaining.

I think Phir Bhi Dil Hai Hindustani was a fantastic entertainer on the commercialisation of television news. When it came, the concept of cut-throat TV journalism hadn't really caught on. But look at what's happening now.

At Sunil Duttsaab's funeral, there were huge crowds of journalists and fans jostling to grab stars' attention. It took away from the solemnity of the occasion.

Swades also told a truth about the quality of life, though it was not as entertaining as Phir Bhi Dil Hai Hindustani. It's like this: A film on the life of Mahatma Gandhi cannot be made deliberately entertaining. Every theme has its own mood and tempo.

And that mood and tempo is established from Frame 1. From the promos of Paheli to the credit titles, I hope the mood of the movie comes across to the audience. I love comedy, but Paheli isn't a funny film, though it does have light moments.

Q: Amol Palekar isn't the first avant-garde director you've worked with.
A: Yes, I've worked with Mani Kaul (Idiot, the 1991 telefilm based on Fyodor Dostoyevsky's novel) , Kundan Shah (Kabhi Haan Kabhi Naa, in 1993), Ketan Mehta (1992's Maya Memsa'ab, and 1995's Oh Darling Yeh Hai India).

But being the producer in Paheli, this was the first occasion when I got to observe a so-called serious director so closely. Earlier, I was younger and brasher. I just did my job and went home. This is my first real brush with the mindset of an avant-garde filmmaker.

Q: There are stories of differences of opinion with Amol Palekar.
A: Isn't that natural? We are different people. I've had differences of opinion with Karan (Johar) and Farah (Khan). But those are friends, so the differences didn't seem like major things. Amol Palekar was an entirely new experience. And, like I said, I am the producer of Paheli.

Q: And also its leading man.
A: Correction. Rani Mukerji is the hero. I'm the supporting actor. Rather, supporting actors, since I have two roles!

I like the story. I told it to my kids, in my own way. And they found it very sweet. And I have a child's heart and imagination. I can't be pompous enough to feel audiences will go along with anything I do. As long as they find Paheli entertaining, they'll come to see it. Those who expect to see me in Armani and Calvin Klein may be put off.

Q: Since Rani is the hero, maybe she should've used the moustache?
A: Not allowed for women. Paheli is all about the non-permissible things that women, without a moustache, do.

 Отправлено: 26.06.05 17:11. Заголовок: Re:

Q: You think the audience would take to a film about a woman who gets impregnated by a ghost?
A: I hope they don't go home and try to make love to a ghost. People know cinema is make-believe. And nowadays a lot of my friends like Karan Johar and Sunita Menon believe in ghosts. I don't believe in ghosts.

But if you believe a man can believe that a man can come back from the dead to save his wife -- like in Ghost -- why not Paheli? If you can believe an 80-year-old woman can continue to love the man she loved as a young girl like in Titanic, then why not a love story between a ghost and a woman?

And if you can believe that a man can be in a prison cell for 20 years without speaking to anyone (his role in Veer-Zaara), and if you can believe smoking on-screen encourages smoking in real life, then you can believe anything!

Q: Paheli seems like it'll puzzle most of your fans.
A: Why is that? It's a love triangle between a man, his wife and a ghost. I happen to play two of the roles. I do believe love stories are immensely liked by audiences in India, and abroad. In the West, there are better action and offbeat films.

But when it comes to love stories, I believe we're unbeatable. There are so many 'love' emotions which come naturally to us. A German friend of mine put it so well: 'We've perfected the art of technology in our country. But we've forgotten how to cry in our films. For a good cry we have to go to your films.' I think we tell love tales from our heart. That's why they work so well.

Q: You keep saying you're tired of doing love stories.
A: Yeah. That's like saying I'm tired of travelling in a car. Doesn't mean I'll start moving around in a chopper. Love stories are a way of life. And I do believe every story we tell is finally a love story. Even in a sci-fi film like Star Wars, there is a love angle. I do get bored doing the same kind of love stories. That's where Paheli comes in, just like Arnold Schwarzenegger who does a Kindergarten Cop in-between his action routine.

I need to do just three films a year -- and I do them very honestly. I try to make each of my films look as different as possible. Sometimes they all end up looking similar, as was the case during the year of Darr, Anjaam and Baazigar. But Main Hoon Na, Veer-Zaara, and Swades are as different from one another as humanly possible.

I don't consciously work out strategies and 'phases' for my films. I've reached a stage in my career where I just tell the story that I want to. I do my best along with the director. I don't think about the end-results. But yes, I do want to say things in my films that have a social relevance. Paheli talks about the loneliness of a rural wife who's left behind by her husband.

Q: Again, you think the film will work?
A: Swades may not have been a blockbuster. But I'm proud of it. Likewise Paheli. It's targeted at an audience that would like to see more than just songs and dances, though there are plenty of those, and I'm proud of them. If you are in love, you'll like Paheli.

 Отправлено: 27.06.05 10:06. Заголовок: Re:

Natalya пишет:

цитата

---

Q: Amol Palekar isn't the first avant-garde director you've worked with.
A: Yes, I've worked with Mani Kaul (Idiot, the 1991 telefilm based on Fyodor Dostoyevsky's novel)

---

о как

 Отправлено: 27.06.05 10:09. Заголовок: Re:

kvazarka

Играл роль Рогожина, если я не ошибаюсь

 Отправлено: 27.06.05 10:17. Заголовок: Re:

Lo пишет:

цитата

---

Играл роль Рогожина, если я не ошибаюсь

---

ну вааще.... наш пострел везде поспел

 Отправлено: 28.06.05 09:21. Заголовок: Re:

Интервью Шахрук Кхана на MTV-Indea
http://srk-for.narod.ru/hum.html/#2

 Отправлено: 28.06.05 09:27. Заголовок: Re:

Lo пишет:

цитата

---

Играл роль Рогожина, если я не ошибаюсь

---

Вот балин :)
а я когда в фильмографии увидела такой момент, почему-то сразу решила, что ну кого еще наш мальчик мог там играть.. как не идиота... :))))))

пы сы самое ценное в единственном купленном мною номере журнала Мир индийского кино - это шаховская фильмография, с указанием (приклеенных форматом) русских названий

 Отправлено: 28.06.05 09:47. Заголовок: Re:

4837464 пишет:

цитата

---

а я когда в фильмографии увидела такой момент, почему-то сразу решила, что ну кого еще наш мальчик мог там играть.. как не идиота... :))))))

---

Шурка, ну что ж ты так... о нем он же у нас геееений! ге-ний!

 Отправлено: 28.06.05 09:53. Заголовок: Re:

так это одно и то же :)

 Отправлено: 28.06.05 10:01. Заголовок: Re:

4837464

ах, ну да... я и забыла

 Отправлено: 28.06.05 10:05. Заголовок: Re:

Кармелитка

большое спасибо , получла огромное удовольствие

 Отправлено: 28.06.05 11:43. Заголовок: Re:

knopa

пожалуйста!!!

 Отправлено: 28.06.05 11:49. Заголовок: Re:

http://www.indomania.net/40%20questions%20Kajol.htm
http://www.indomania.net/40%20questions%20SRK.htm
-40 вопросов к Шахруку и Каджол
http://www.indomania.net/Kajol-big%20league.htm
интервью про Каджол
http://srk-for.narod.ru/ddlj.html/#4
Шах и Каджол
http://www.indomania.net/SRK-Interview.htm
http://www.indomania.net/SRK-Friends.htm
про Шаха!!!

 Отправлено: 28.06.05 14:06. Заголовок: Re:

Вопрос времени!
О ТАНИШЕ МУКХЕРДЖИ
Что нужно делать Айшварии Рай, чтобы стать удачливой актрисой: мнение коллег

 Отправлено: 28.06.05 14:11. Заголовок: Re:

Алина, спасибо за ссылочку! наконец-то я узнала (помимо прочего), что такое крор!

цитата: (1 карор = 10 млн. рупий) конец цитаты

(от себя: крор, вообще-то, ну да неважно)

 Отправлено: 28.06.05 14:12. Заголовок: Re:

4837464 пишет:

цитата

---

наконец-то я узнала (помимо прочего), что такое крор!

---

а то извелась, бедная, до бессонницы

 Отправлено: 28.06.05 14:13. Заголовок: Re:

ой не говори подруга... ночей панимашь не сплю, все думу думаю тяжелую :)

 Отправлено: 28.06.05 14:15. Заголовок: Re:

4837464

а сейчас попытайся посчитать, скока у тя кроров

 Отправлено: 28.06.05 14:18. Заголовок: Re:

хочешь, чтобы я совсем спать перестала?

 Отправлено: 28.06.05 14:21. Заголовок: Re:

4837464

не, я не так жестока

 Отправлено: 28.06.05 17:51. Заголовок: Re:

Кармелитка

Зачем давать ссылки на то, что мы и сами можем найти?... Ты найди то, что никто до тебя не находил... Тогда оценим...

 Отправлено: 28.06.05 18:21. Заголовок: Re:

Из интервью с Шахом (по ссылке, что дала Алина), он говорит: " хотя Рани теперь часть моей семьи". Вооона как это теперь называется... Затесалась-таки, сладкая моя... Интересно только, в качестве кого. И вообще, сколько у него членов... этой... семьи...